From thread: RE: [Zope] Large Portal requirements (was: Other web servers?) At 03:15 PM 6/14/99 -0400, Michel wrote: In the future, we will be have the client server model of ZODB3 (which will be a commercial product) that lets you have multiple Zope frontend processes (possibly on different machines) accessing multiple database backend processes (possibly on different machines). Also, ZServer is currently multi-threaded, but there is no theoretical limitation to making it multi-process, in which each Zope instance will have it's own Python and thus it's own global Python lock, thus giving the OS the ability to schedule multiple processes among multiple processors, a little heavier than threads on multi-processor, but *vastly* easier to impliment and far more stable.
And then...
From thread: RE: [Zope] How stable is the 2.0 alpha release? At 11:12 AM 6/16/99 -0400, Michel wrote: Yes, 2.0 alpha will work fine with an existing Database *if* you run it in ZODB2 mode (no concurrency). If you run it in ZODB3 mode (the default) your Data.bbb file will not even be used, rather, a different file called Data.fs (fs = File Storage, remember, ZODB3 can use multiple backend stores) will be used. Data.fs and Data.bbb are two different formats, and are incompatable. Real Soon Now we will have a conversion script to upgrade from Data.bbb format to Data.fs format, but I for one, will promise no date.
To clarify my understanding. Will their be a non client-server version of ZODB3 which offers concurrency that will be a part of the non-commercial, open source part of Zope? Jimmie Houchin
Jimmie Houchin wrote:
Will their be a non client-server version of ZODB3 which offers concurrency that will be a part of the non-commercial, open source part of Zope?
Yes, but the concurrency will be achieved through multiple threads in one process. Jim -- Jim Fulton mailto:jim@digicool.com Python Powered! Technical Director (888) 344-4332 http://www.python.org Digital Creations http://www.digicool.com http://www.zope.org Under US Code Title 47, Sec.227(b)(1)(C), Sec.227(a)(2)(B) This email address may not be added to any commercial mail list with out my permission. Violation of my privacy with advertising or SPAM will result in a suit for a MINIMUM of $500 damages/incident, $1500 for repeats.
participants (2)
-
Jim Fulton -
Jimmie Houchin