Anyone running production on the RH9 system with all the available upgrades and patches? I know there have been problems but rumour has it that it is now stable and playing well with Zope. Can anyone confirm from their direct experience? RH9 implements CPU affinity which may be useful for performance tuning in a SMP situation. Has anyone had experience with Zope using the new affinity calls in the 2.5 kernel?
--On Sonntag, 20. Juli 2003 13:16 Uhr -0700 Dennis Allison <allison@sumeru.stanford.EDU> wrote:
Anyone running production on the RH9 system with all the available upgrades and patches? I know there have been problems but rumour has it that it is now stable and playing well with Zope. Can anyone confirm from their direct experience?
i runs fine as long as you compile python and zope on your own. -aj
Are you using the old or the new verision of threads? Did you need to resort to the LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1 hack? On Sun, 20 Jul 2003, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On Sonntag, 20. Juli 2003 13:16 Uhr -0700 Dennis Allison <allison@sumeru.stanford.EDU> wrote:
Anyone running production on the RH9 system with all the available upgrades and patches? I know there have been problems but rumour has it that it is now stable and playing well with Zope. Can anyone confirm from their direct experience?
i runs fine as long as you compile python and zope on your own.
-aj
_______________________________________________ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
i just installed python using "configure;make" without any special environment hacks. i works perfectly but in general i think rh9 is a very bad release since there are tons of other problems (not releated to Zope/Python). -aj --On Sonntag, 20. Juli 2003 13:44 Uhr -0700 Dennis Allison <allison@sumeru.stanford.EDU> wrote:
Are you using the old or the new verision of threads? Did you need to resort to the
LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1
hack?
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On Sonntag, 20. Juli 2003 13:16 Uhr -0700 Dennis Allison <allison@sumeru.stanford.EDU> wrote:
Anyone running production on the RH9 system with all the available upgrades and patches? I know there have been problems but rumour has it that it is now stable and playing well with Zope. Can anyone confirm from their direct experience?
i runs fine as long as you compile python and zope on your own.
-aj
_______________________________________________ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
That has been my impression although the upgrades seem to have touched everything... I'm about to have to commit to a base release for production and am still debating whether to use RH7.3 or RH9. Can you describe some of the other problems you've had with RH9. I'm running it here on a desktop with few problems, but it's undemanding as environments go. On Sun, 20 Jul 2003, Andreas Jung wrote:
i just installed python using "configure;make" without any special environment hacks. i works perfectly but in general i think rh9 is a very bad release since there are tons of other problems (not releated to Zope/Python).
-aj
--On Sonntag, 20. Juli 2003 13:44 Uhr -0700 Dennis Allison <allison@sumeru.stanford.EDU> wrote:
Are you using the old or the new verision of threads? Did you need to resort to the
LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1
hack?
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On Sonntag, 20. Juli 2003 13:16 Uhr -0700 Dennis Allison <allison@sumeru.stanford.EDU> wrote:
Anyone running production on the RH9 system with all the available upgrades and patches? I know there have been problems but rumour has it that it is now stable and playing well with Zope. Can anyone confirm from their direct experience?
i runs fine as long as you compile python and zope on your own.
-aj
_______________________________________________ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
_______________________________________________ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
Dennis Allison wrote
Anyone running production on the RH9 system with all the available upgrades and patches? I know there have been problems but rumour has it that it is now stable and playing well with Zope. Can anyone confirm from their direct experience?
Not running in production, but you _really_ want to have an updated glibc. (note: rpm -U glibc* is not the way to upgrade it - this will hose your system - use up2date). Anthony -- Anthony Baxter <anthony@interlink.com.au> It's never too late to have a happy childhood.
-----Original Message----- From: zope-admin@zope.org [mailto:zope-admin@zope.org]On Behalf Of Anthony Baxter
Anyone running production on the RH9 system with all the available upgrades and patches? I know there have been problems but rumour has it that it is now stable and playing well with Zope. Can anyone confirm from their direct experience?
Not running in production, but you _really_ want to have an updated glibc. (note: rpm -U glibc* is not the way to upgrade it - this will hose your system - use up2date).
I've been running RH9 in production on 5 servers since first of May with no problems once I updated the kernel and glibc. I did have problems upgrading glibc (had to use rescue mode from the install CDs to upgrade it), but once upgraded I've had no problems. I've had no problems with Zope 2.6.2b2 either. I installed the Python 2.1 RPMs from python.org and Zope from source (as always) and they've been humming along happy as can be. I wouldn't consider RH9 a painless upgrade, but I haven't had any problems once I installed the early errata. Also, RH7.x/8 will not be supported after the end of the year, so keep that in mind. _______________________ Ron Bickers Logic Etc, Inc.
participants (4)
-
Andreas Jung -
Anthony Baxter -
Dennis Allison -
Ron Bickers