RE: [Zope] How to manage chapter-based documentation?
http://backtalk.sourceforge.net/ Incidentally, I have sent an email to Chris McDonough a few weeks back about a partial mod of backtalk I have done that uses ReStructuredText (http://docutils.sourceforge.net/) instead of the Zope StructuredText (which has lots of problems IMO). Chris did acknowledge my email but never got back to me, and I haven't worked on it since then either, but if someone is interested, let me know and I'll post what I did so far somewhere. Cheers, Jean Ben Chapman wrote:
I want my staff to create documentation about our work procedures in structured text. My idea was that each "chapter" would be contained in a folder. I would like these documents to automagically have a table of contents, back and next links, etc., as is common in DocBook-derived web-based documentation.
I know that the Zope Book authors must have put together something like this to assemble their book. Is this available anywhere or is an alternative product like this available?
http://backtalk.sourceforge.net/> Incidentally, I have sent an email to Chris McDonough a few weeks back about a partial mod of backtalk I have done that uses ReStructuredText (http://docutils.sourceforge.net/) instead of the Zope StructuredText (which has lots of problems IMO). Chris did acknowledge my email but never got back to me, and I haven't worked on it since then either, but if someone is interested, let me know and I'll post what I did so far somewhere.
Yikes, yes, sorry.... I apologize for not getting back to you! Do you think you would be interested in creating a "modal" BackTalk where you could switch between restructuredtext and classic stx? If so, I would be happy to give you contributor access to the sourceforge project. We have a lot of documents in BackTalk that depend on the (mis?)-features of classic stx, so to replace the classic-stx-based implementation with a restructuredtext implementation wholesale is less than desirable, but I have no problem giving people the choice on a per-book or per-document basis whether they'd like to use stx or re-stx. Thanks again, - C
participants (2)
-
Chris McDonough -
jlagardeï¼ bigfoot.com