Are there any other attorneys out there learning ZOPE. If yes, I would like to discuss the application of ZOPE to Law Office information handling in general and to the related topic of the move to an XML based Electronic Court Record in particular. Please contact me directly instead of via the mail list. For the non-attorney members, the legal community is at the very early stage of discussing why and how we can/should move from treating information as a stack of paper documents inches or feet thick to an XML based Electronic Court Record, where documents serve as the medium for exchanging information with a common database. This is were Zope comes in. The study of Zope looks to me to be the best way to learn how to transform information handling and workflow in the legal community from the paper-stack database into an electronic database. For, if the courts are going to serve as repositories of common information, and accept input via documents marked up in XML, then law offices will have to mirror the change. Second thought, If you agree with me that Zope, probably plus a relational data base, is a better way to handle information then a stack of paper in a file cabinet, or a set of word processing documents in a computer's file system, you may want to show Zope to the attorneys at your company and win them over? Just a thought. Sincerely, Brian Hickman Attorney at Law
Brian Hickman wrote:
Are there any other attorneys out there learning ZOPE.
Yes. Although I though I was the only one. Good to see I'm not.
If yes, I would like to discuss the application of ZOPE to Law Office information handling in general and to the related topic of the move to an XML based Electronic Court Record in particular. Please contact me directly instead of via the mail list.
Are you just milling over ideas or do you have something more specific in mind? I've though the idea over recently as one of my clients filed a patent infringement suit in the Southern District of Texas. Problem is, the Magistrate and the Judge in that case are both technology adverse, and don't like the "intrusion." I haven't broached the topic with the other side, but I suspect that I would get a better reception to that idea there. Has that been your experience? Frankly, I think that the courts would be more open to technology if it were easier to use. Current court docket programs were clearly written by non-attorneys. Definitely room for improvement in this area. Regards, Ronald L. Chichester Attorney at Law
participants (2)
-
Brian Hickman -
Ronald L. Chichester