JZ>I can also JZ> JZ><dtml-var "Util.utility_function(REQUEST=REQUEST)"> JZ> JZ>but that is also a little long-winded. OB>DTML objects are really callable instances of classess. dtml-with calls OB>them automagically, but when you use dtml-var "..." these quotes move you OB>from DTML to Python, and in Python there is no automagical call - you must OB>call the objects yourself. There is no way to avoid it. but <dtml-var "Util.utility_function()">, which is a little less long-winded, should also work. regards, hamish -- Get your firstname@lastname email for FREE at http://Nameplanet.com/?su
On 31 Aug 2001 hamish@allan.tc wrote:
JZ>I can also JZ> JZ><dtml-var "Util.utility_function(REQUEST=REQUEST)"> JZ> JZ>but that is also a little long-winded.
OB>DTML objects are really callable instances of classess. dtml-with calls OB>them automagically, but when you use dtml-var "..." these quotes move you OB>from DTML to Python, and in Python there is no automagical call - you must OB>call the objects yourself. There is no way to avoid it.
but <dtml-var "Util.utility_function()">, which is a little less long-winded, should also work.
Alas, no. When DTML automagically calls a DTML object, it passes current namespace. If you call your objects from Python, you must pass namespace yourself: <dtml-var "Util.utility_function(_.None, _)"> Oleg. ---- Oleg Broytmann http://www.zope.org/Members/phd/ phd@phd.pp.ru Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN.
participants (2)
-
hamish＠allan.tc -
Oleg Broytmann