I installed 2.3.0 today and since then the Zope installation is gone away sometimes. Before I had 2.2.2 and 2.2.5 installed without any problems for MONTHS!!!!! 2.3.0 seems to be a little unstable for now, and I think I will return back to 2.2.5 again. There are other problems with SiteRoot which worked like a champ for months under 2.2.5. I don't understand why it can be declared as 'stable' with such behaving. Where these bugs not detected in beta phase? _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Hi! Really not. Perfect product! Thanks, DC guys! On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Stephan Goeldi wrote:
I installed 2.3.0 today and since then the Zope installation is gone away sometimes. Before I had 2.2.2 and 2.2.5 installed without any problems for MONTHS!!!!!
I have no such problems.
2.3.0 seems to be a little unstable for now, and I think I will return back to 2.2.5 again. There are other problems with SiteRoot which worked like a champ for months under 2.2.5.
Again, 2.3.0 works for me pretty nice in this aspect. I am going to switch to VirtualHostMonster, but now I use SiteRoot, and I am satsified.
I don't understand why it can be declared as 'stable' with such behaving. Where these bugs not detected in beta phase?
It was declared "stable" exactly because no one caugth such behaviour. In the world of free software it is *you* who test software, send patches to authors, etc. No one ought to do something special for you. Why didn't you test 2.3 betas and caught these errors? Ah, you want only stable software! Then pay for it! Either you must (I said "must") pay with your time (test betas, make patches) or you can pay money. Buy a contract. DC will provide you with all neccessary details about their contracts. Good luck! Oleg. ---- Oleg Broytmann http://www.zope.org/Members/phd/ phd@phd.pp.ru Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN.
On Thu, 8 Feb 2001 17:31:17 +0300 (MSK), Oleg Broytmann <phd@phd.pp.ru> wrote: I think its fair to say that the beta cycle for 2.3.0 was suprisingly short.
It was declared "stable" exactly because no one caugth such behaviour. In the world of free software it is *you* who test software, send patches to authors, etc.
Even those keeping up with CVS might not have had time to test 2.3.0 between the last feature going in, and it being declared stable. I know I didnt! Toby Dickenson tdickenson@geminidataloggers.com
participants (3)
-
Oleg Broytmann -
Stephan Goeldi -
Toby Dickenson