Due to the sheer volume of personal attacks I have received from members of this list over the past three days, I find myself in somewhat of a predicament. These emails have been rather upsetting to me, and while I'm normally fairly thick skinned about such things, this has simply gone too far. I now find myself dreading reading my email, and that is unacceptable. I am bracing for a new round of the same once the digest goes out, hopefully the percentage of cowards is somewhat less in the digest userbase than the live userbase. I'm have unsubscribed from the mailing lists, and therefore I guess I invalidate my previous request for a new one. Thanks it's been fun.
On 21/10/01 5:37 pm, "Andrew Kenneth Milton" <akm@theinternet.com.au> wrote:
Due to the sheer volume of personal attacks I have received from members of this list over the past three days, I find myself in somewhat of a predicament.
These emails have been rather upsetting to me, and while I'm normally fairly thick skinned about such things, this has simply gone too far. I now find myself dreading reading my email, and that is unacceptable.
I am bracing for a new round of the same once the digest goes out, hopefully the percentage of cowards is somewhat less in the digest userbase than the live userbase.
I'm have unsubscribed from the mailing lists, and therefore I guess I invalidate my previous request for a new one.
Thanks it's been fun.
Andrew, I thought your idea was a perfectly sensible and appropriate one. I hadn't got around to emailing an "I support the call for a zope-hackers type list" and it looks like I left it too late. Bugger (solidarity with our antipodean brethren there! :) The volume on the Zope list *is* large (2000+ messages per month) and this makes it difficult to manage properly. Certainly I find it difficult to reply to any but the most desperate and well-directed post (check the archives, I used to ;). I was certainly looking forward to joining a zope-hackers list where some of the more esoteric aspects of Zope would be discussed, for example ZEO and CST setups, which would certainly *not* be the easiest thing to get your head around for most of the subscribers of the Zope list. This kind of stuff has got shifted onto Zope-dev, which (as I understand it) is supposed to be for discussion of changes to the Zope core itself.
From my POV, the main Zope list is fine for people wanting to know if Zope can do the job they have at hand (witness the *excellent* post by Sean about squid and multiple zopes) as well as those people getting to grips with ZopeZen such as acquisition and object publishing or the powerful permissions system. It's also ideal for posting snippets of DTML, and the quick "stuff in double quotes is python" post.
Therefore, it seems to me that there certainly *is* some ground for people to discuss using zope in non-trivial setups and situations. Hope you resubscribe soon, Tone. -- Dr Tony McDonald, Assistant Director, FMCC, http://www.fmcc.org.uk/ The Medical School, Newcastle University Tel: +44 191 243 6140 A Zope list for UK HE/FE http://www.fmcc.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/zope
On Sun, 2001-10-21 at 09:37, Andrew Kenneth Milton wrote:
Due to the sheer volume of personal attacks I have received from members of this list over the past three days, I find myself in somewhat of a predicament.
These emails have been rather upsetting to me, and while I'm normally fairly thick skinned about such things, this has simply gone too far. I now find myself dreading reading my email, and that is unacceptable.
It *is* unacceptable. If I were you, I would be strongly considering making these emails public.
I am bracing for a new round of the same once the digest goes out, hopefully the percentage of cowards is somewhat less in the digest userbase than the live userbase.
I'm have unsubscribed from the mailing lists, and therefore I guess I invalidate my previous request for a new one.
Andrew, I hope that you resubscribe in the future. Anyone who has attacked you privately should be ashamed of themselves. No matter how much you disagree with someones views, telling them (or threatening them) to shut up is *never* an appropriate response. In fact, since they chose not to attack you in full view of the rest of this list (so to speak) they probably *are* ashamed of themselves. Now, I've been a part of this community for quite a while, and my activity level has fluctuated a great deal. I've done a bit of hand-holding for others, I've both asked and answered questions. I put my job on the line once to promote Zope as a solution for an Intranet. I want the community to continue to grow, and for that growth to accellerate. It is now getting to be *too much work* to sort through the postings on this and other lists. I find that I'm confining more and more of my reading to zope-dev@zope.org and the more specialized lists such as zpt@zope.org. But even the volume of zope-dev alone is too much for me to keep up with and read every posting. I want more specialization. I want specialization by subject, I want specialization by skill-level, and I want specialization by audience. When I'm in the mood to help someone out, I want it to be as easy as possible to find a newbie and answer their question. When I'm in that mood, the newbie questions are the wheat, and the rest are the chaff I have to sort through. Right now it's getting to be more and more work to sort whatever particular wheat I'm looking for just then from the rest of the chaff. This *is not* elitism. The Zope community needs to continue to grow, and the way to do that is to allow it to diversify and specialize. Let the flames begin. Michael Bernstein. P.S. private flames just *might* be made public
After asking Andrew on IRC last night, I decided to post my response on a wiki page. It's the first document in a new 'Community' wikiweb: http://www.zope.org/Members/webmaven/Community/AkmSupport If anyone want to add pages to this wikiweb, please do so from the FrontPage for now, we'll figure out how to organize it later. Thanks, Michael Bernstein.
On Sunday 21 October 2001 12:37 pm, Andrew Kenneth Milton allegedly wrote:
Due to the sheer volume of personal attacks I have received from members of this list over the past three days, I find myself in somewhat of a predicament.
These emails have been rather upsetting to me, and while I'm normally fairly thick skinned about such things, this has simply gone too far. I now find myself dreading reading my email, and that is unacceptable.
I am bracing for a new round of the same once the digest goes out, hopefully the percentage of cowards is somewhat less in the digest userbase than the live userbase.
I'm have unsubscribed from the mailing lists, and therefore I guess I invalidate my previous request for a new one.
Thanks it's been fun.
If anyone has been rude to you privately I strongly suggest you post these messages publically and let us have them for breakfast. Don't let some dumb-asses ruin your day! /---------------------------------------------------\ Casey Duncan, Sr. Web Developer National Legal Aid and Defender Association c.duncan@nlada.org \---------------------------------------------------/
----- Original Message ----- From: "Casey Duncan" <c.duncan@nlada.org> To: <bit-bucket@theinternet.com.au>; "Andrew Kenneth Milton" <akm@theinternet.com.au>; <zope@zope.org> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 2:48 PM Subject: Re: [Zope] Thanks <snip>importatn stuff</snip>
If anyone has been rude to you privately I strongly suggest you post these messages publically and let us have them for breakfast.
Don't let some dumb-asses ruin your day!
I second this wholeheartedly!
On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 03:04:22PM +0100, Phil Harris wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: "Casey Duncan" <c.duncan@nlada.org> <snip>importatn stuff</snip>
If anyone has been rude to you privately I strongly suggest you post these messages publically and let us have them for breakfast.
Don't let some dumb-asses ruin your day!
I second this wholeheartedly!
Third. I don't want to have anyone for breakfast, but because people should be willing to stand behind their statements, and that includes being open for criticism and rebuttal. -- paul winkler home: http://www.slinkp.com music: http://www.reacharms.com calendars: http://www.calendargalaxy.com
On Sunday 21 October 2001 12:37 pm, Andrew Kenneth Milton allegedly wrote:
Due to the sheer volume of personal attacks I have received from members of this list over the past three days, I find myself in somewhat of a predicament.
These emails have been rather upsetting to me, and while I'm normally fairly thick skinned about such things, this has simply gone too far. I now find myself dreading reading my email, and that is unacceptable.
I am bracing for a new round of the same once the digest goes out, hopefully the percentage of cowards is somewhat less in the digest userbase than the live userbase.
I'm have unsubscribed from the mailing lists, and therefore I guess I invalidate my previous request for a new one.
Thanks it's been fun.
I hope anyone who decided it would be fun to pick on Andrew in private shows some dignity by sending him an apology and hopes that he decides to rejoin us in the future. As Jane once said: "Don't be a Dick." nuff said. /---------------------------------------------------\ Casey Duncan, Sr. Web Developer National Legal Aid and Defender Association c.duncan@nlada.org \---------------------------------------------------/
participants (6)
-
Andrew Kenneth Milton -
Casey Duncan -
Michael R. Bernstein -
Paul Winkler -
Phil Harris -
Tony McDonald