Geir Bækholt wrote:

Wouldn't removing the contents of noscript and noframes be off-target? They exist solely for the purpose of providing alternative content to what would be rendered by a script or in a frame.

It appears to me to be practical to keep this alternative content, both in a text-only version, and in the indexes in a catalog (unless you use them in the non-recommended, html3.2 way (e.g : "you need frames to see this content"), that is...)

:)

I agree, reluctantly... In my case, I am capturing/indexing from a finite set of web sites where these tags are never used correctly. Maybe it could be a configurable option for Strip-o-gram... Ken