Oleg Broytmann writes:
I am using SiteAccess and 2.1.6 at iMeme, and they play fine together.
This is one success story among millions failures. I certainly would not upgrade to 2.1.6.
I am running SiteAccess on two 2.1.6 installs -- one on a RedHat 6.1 box and the other on a RH6.2 box. Both work like a champ. These were both fresh 2.1.6 installs. Does the problem typically occur w/upgrades or did I just get lucky twice? I ask because I have a 2.1.4 install that I've been planning to upgrade -- and it serves several domains and depends heavily upon SiteAccess.
Oleg. (All opinions are mine and not of my employer) ---- Oleg Broytmann Foundation for Effective Policies phd@phd.russ.ru Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN.
-glw
"Wright, Geoff" wrote:
Oleg Broytmann writes:
I am using SiteAccess and 2.1.6 at iMeme, and they play fine together.
This is one success story among millions failures. I certainly would not upgrade to 2.1.6.
Oleg, you may indeed have had problems with SQL methods, but if you can repeatably make 2.1.6 not work with SiteAccess 1.0.1 , you should let us know about it. I don't think there are millions of failures with SiteAccess.
I am running SiteAccess on two 2.1.6 installs -- one on a RedHat 6.1 box and the other on a RH6.2 box. Both work like a champ.
These were both fresh 2.1.6 installs. Does the problem typically occur w/upgrades or did I just get lucky twice? I ask because I have a 2.1.4 install that I've been planning to upgrade -- and it serves several domains and depends heavily upon SiteAccess.
I don't believe you were lucky. I have had no problems whatsoever with SiteAccess (aside from known issues). ethan mindlace fremen Zopatista Community Liason
On Sun, 25 Jun 2000, ethan mindlace fremen wrote:
repeatably make 2.1.6 not work with SiteAccess 1.0.1 , you should let us know about it. I don't think there are millions of failures with SiteAccess.
There certainly are. Many people in Russian Python/Zope User Group asked in our mailing list "What the hell with authentication in 2.1.6?" - and downgrading to 2.1.4 always helped. Anyway it's too late to solve the puzzle - I am in the middle of the process of upgrading to 2.2.0b2. Oleg. (All opinions are mine and not of my employer) ---- Oleg Broytmann Foundation for Effective Policies phd@phd.russ.ru Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN.
Oleg Broytmann wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jun 2000, ethan mindlace fremen wrote:
repeatably make 2.1.6 not work with SiteAccess 1.0.1 , you should let us know about it. I don't think there are millions of failures with SiteAccess.
There certainly are. Many people in Russian Python/Zope User Group asked in our mailing list "What the hell with authentication in 2.1.6?" - and downgrading to 2.1.4 always helped.
You have a group millions large??? Wow. ;-)
On Mon, 26 Jun 2000, Bill Anderson wrote:
You have a group millions large??? Wow. ;-)
No, but three errors are more than enough... Oleg. (All opinions are mine and not of my employer) ---- Oleg Broytmann Foundation for Effective Policies phd@phd.russ.ru Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN.
participants (4)
-
Bill Anderson -
ethan mindlace fremen -
Oleg Broytmann -
Wright, Geoff