[ZF] Official Packages / ZSCP / Development process
Jens Vagelpohl
jens at dataflake.org
Wed Aug 8 08:40:35 EDT 2007
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 8 Aug 2007, at 14:33, Christian Theune wrote:
> If yes, I'll just shut up and wait what happens. The goals are not
> directly my goals and it still seems overdesigned to me and I'd be
> afraid to loose huge amounts of time with this.
Same here. Seeing what happens. Just like the foundation bylaws
themselves the ZSCP process seemed very, umh, baroque when I read it
a long time ago.
> If not, I'd wonder when we can start working on the development
> process
> issues (in a lightweight way).
I don't remember (or probably didn't participate in the right mailing
list) the discussion about what goals we are trying to reach. That's
the first step. IMHO since nothing is decided there is no harm in
discussing and developing alternate processes. That could start
immediately.
jens
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFGubnDRAx5nvEhZLIRAosXAJwJBRrKdGJLT+AFzX0UKiI1OnjYEQCgs5gN
ba5yMkwF9iCKC3DojHdq/sc=
=rL4Q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Foundation
mailing list