[Grok-dev] Re: static versus Zope 3's directory resources

[Jan-Wijbrand Kolman]

Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
>> (personally I think it could very well be in Grok itself.)
> 
> Both :).

:)

> I think we want to split up Grok for it to be more modular. This is a 
> perfect example of a single, self-contained piece of functionality that 
> makes sense to be shipped with *and* without Grok.
> 
> I would personally like to tackle to split-up of Grok pretty soon. I've 
> done an experiment a while back already and it worked well. The lessons 
> learned have been incorporated into the 0.11 release already. My plans 
> are to start with splitting off the ZCML directive implementation and 
> the registration of core components (adapters, utilities, subscribers) 
> before the year is over...

So, as a practical result of the split, you could imagine to have a 
"grok.resources" package at some point?

regards,
jw