[Grok-dev] Re: static versus Zope 3's directory resources

[Philipp von Weitershausen]

Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote:
> Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
>>> (personally I think it could very well be in Grok itself.)
>>
>> Both :).
> 
> :)
> 
>> I think we want to split up Grok for it to be more modular. This is a 
>> perfect example of a single, self-contained piece of functionality 
>> that makes sense to be shipped with *and* without Grok.
>>
>> I would personally like to tackle to split-up of Grok pretty soon. 
>> I've done an experiment a while back already and it worked well. The 
>> lessons learned have been incorporated into the 0.11 release already. 
>> My plans are to start with splitting off the ZCML directive 
>> implementation and the registration of core components (adapters, 
>> utilities, subscribers) before the year is over...
> 
> So, as a practical result of the split, you could imagine to have a 
> "grok.resources" package at some point?

Right. We can't make 'grok' a namespace package, though, because it 
contains code in __init__. We'll have to use something else. Martijn 
wants to use grokcore.