[Grok-dev] inspect.html versus inspect in admin UI

[Kevin Smith]

It's a little more typing, but how about using a prefix?

e.g. grok-inspect




Uli Fouquet wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 12.09.2007, 18:06 +0200 schrieb Martijn Faassen:
>   
>> Hi there,
>>
>> Today I noticed that the admin UI's object browser uses the view name 
>> inspect.html. Grok tends to consistently use view names without 
>> extensions, so just inspect should be sufficient. Plus it's slightly 
>> easier to type /inspect to get the inspector.
>>     
>
> The intention was not to block the 'inspect' view name for application
> developers.
>
>   
>> Eventually we might get in trouble with applications that want to define 
>> their own 'inspect', but it's not a huge problem so let's cross that 
>> bridge when we get there.
>>     
>
> The cleaner solution might be to do a different traversal and to use a
> pseudo-namespace of some kind, like the class browser does. This,
> however, would mean a broader effort.
>
> Anyway, it's not a big thing to change the view name to 'inspect'. I'll
> do it tonight if no further objections appear.
>
> Kind regards,
>
>   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/grok-dev/attachments/20070912/beca6020/attachment.htm