[Grok-dev] Re: is configure.zcml never tested?

[Martijn Faassen]

Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> Martijn Faassen wrote:
>> Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
>> [snip]
>>> Typically we use functional tests to assert any kind of ZCML 
>>> configuration. In the case of grokcore.component, this would probably 
>>> be overkill.
>>
>> I actually believe there's no need for a configure.zcml at all for 
>> grokcore.component
> 
> Well, what about grokking the grokkers? I think configure.zcml is 
> justified, though it would be very short:
> 
>   <grok package=".meta" />

That should be in meta.zcml, right?

Regards,

Martijn