[Grok-dev] Re: is configure.zcml never tested?

[Philipp von Weitershausen]

Martijn Faassen wrote:
> Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
>> Martijn Faassen wrote:
>>> Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
>>> [snip]
>>>> Typically we use functional tests to assert any kind of ZCML 
>>>> configuration. In the case of grokcore.component, this would 
>>>> probably be overkill.
>>>
>>> I actually believe there's no need for a configure.zcml at all for 
>>> grokcore.component
>>
>> Well, what about grokking the grokkers? I think configure.zcml is 
>> justified, though it would be very short:
>>
>>   <grok package=".meta" />
> 
> That should be in meta.zcml, right?

Yes, you were right