[Grok-dev] Re: collective.namedfile + blob

Dirceu Pereira Tiegs dirceutiegs at gmail.com
Wed Mar 19 17:59:41 EDT 2008


On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 7:24 AM, Martijn Faassen <faassen at startifact.com> wrote:
[snip]
>  I really think the best way to deal with this is to split the
>  responsibilities:
>
>  collective.namedfile - modified so that it allows some
>  subclassing/configuration that allows..
>
>  collective.namedblobfile (or whatever the name is) - subclassing/using
>  collective.namedfile functionality but also needs blob support, so pulls
>   in extra dependencies
>
>  megrok.form - uses collective.namedblobfile

Almost done:

http://pypi.python.org/pypi/collective.namedblobfile/0.1
http://svn.zope.org/megrok.form/branches/collective.namedblobfile_support

I will try to finish and release it today.

Regards,
-- 
Dirceu Pereira Tiegs
Weimar Consultoria

Hospedagem Plone, Zope e Python
http://www.pytown.com


More information about the Grok-dev mailing list