[Grok-dev] Re: collective.namedfile + blob
Dirceu Pereira Tiegs
dirceutiegs at gmail.com
Wed Mar 19 17:59:41 EDT 2008
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 7:24 AM, Martijn Faassen <faassen at startifact.com> wrote:
[snip]
> I really think the best way to deal with this is to split the
> responsibilities:
>
> collective.namedfile - modified so that it allows some
> subclassing/configuration that allows..
>
> collective.namedblobfile (or whatever the name is) - subclassing/using
> collective.namedfile functionality but also needs blob support, so pulls
> in extra dependencies
>
> megrok.form - uses collective.namedblobfile
Almost done:
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/collective.namedblobfile/0.1
http://svn.zope.org/megrok.form/branches/collective.namedblobfile_support
I will try to finish and release it today.
Regards,
--
Dirceu Pereira Tiegs
Weimar Consultoria
Hospedagem Plone, Zope e Python
http://www.pytown.com
More information about the Grok-dev
mailing list