[Grok-dev] Re: collective.namedfile + blob
Martijn Faassen
faassen at startifact.com
Wed Mar 19 18:18:50 EDT 2008
Hey,
Dirceu Pereira Tiegs wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 7:24 AM, Martijn Faassen <faassen at startifact.com> wrote:
> [snip]
>> I really think the best way to deal with this is to split the
>> responsibilities:
>>
>> collective.namedfile - modified so that it allows some
>> subclassing/configuration that allows..
>>
>> collective.namedblobfile (or whatever the name is) - subclassing/using
>> collective.namedfile functionality but also needs blob support, so pulls
>> in extra dependencies
>>
>> megrok.form - uses collective.namedblobfile
>
> Almost done:
>
> http://pypi.python.org/pypi/collective.namedblobfile/0.1
> http://svn.zope.org/megrok.form/branches/collective.namedblobfile_support
>
> I will try to finish and release it today.
Excellent, thanks!
Regards,
Martijn
More information about the Grok-dev
mailing list