[Grok-dev] Alternatives to Grok for Interface based dependency injection

[Tim Cook]

Hi Alec,

On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 14:38 -0300, Alec Munro wrote:
> Hi List,
> 
> (I believe this is known as a GBCW message, though I'm not sure what
> that stands for)
> 

I have no clue.  But it's a cool acronym.
(George Bush Counter-Warfare?) ......

> After wrestling with Grok's installation on and off for the past 6
> months, I have finally come to accept that it currently doesn't
> provide us a compelling enough reason to accept that pain (and I got
> real tired of troubleshooting when people would be unable to install
> my software because of one of Grok's dependencies). 

Hmmmm, as I have a very compelling interest in this I'd like to hear
some of the dirty stories about it.   Was it only on Windows?


Feedback in open source is invaluable; good or bad.

Cheers,
Tim



-- 
Timothy Cook, MSc
Health Informatics Research & Development Services
LinkedIn Profile:http://www.linkedin.com/in/timothywaynecook 
Skype ID == timothy.cook 
**************************************************************
*You may get my Public GPG key from  popular keyservers or   *
*from this link http://timothywayne.cook.googlepages.com/home*
**************************************************************
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/grok-dev/attachments/20090521/812fc4ab/attachment.bin