[Grok-dev] Grok and chameleon
Souheil CHELFOUH
trollfot at gmail.com
Mon Feb 8 04:46:02 EST 2010
That's probably a bit early to start and argue about back compatibility.
Let's try and do the best option for Grok and see how we can get some
backward compatibility.
We do not want to get stuck, obvisouly, nor to burn bridges around us :)
So, let's get started with the chameleon integration already !
2010/2/8 Sylvain Viollon <sylvain at infrae.com>:
> On Sat, 06 Feb 2010 14:59:35 +0100
> Martijn Faassen <faassen at startifact.com> wrote:
>
>> Hey,
>>
>
> Hello,
>
>> I think we should be careful with this stuff. That is, we should
>> definitely allow a profile of grokcore.view that uses the
>> zope.pagetemplate implementation. That should be fine with Zope 2.
>>
>> In general the whole concept that "we can't do this because Zope 2 is
>> using Grok stuff" worries me a little as we might end up in the "too
>> many different stakeholders to move anywhere" situation all too
>> easily. So while I appreciate the input, and I'm going to listen to
>> it, I'd be against letting it weigh so heavily that Grok cannot
>> evolve forward anymore.
>>
>
> I don't have any problem with that change. I think it might conflict
> with people using five.pt, maybe, but I don't. I use
> megrok.chameleon, where I want Chameleon templates (explicitly).
>
>
> Sylvain,
>
> --
> Sylvain Viollon -- Infrae
> t +31 10 243 7051 -- http://infrae.com
> Hoevestraat 10 3033GC Rotterdam -- The Netherlands
> _______________________________________________
> Grok-dev mailing list
> Grok-dev at zope.org
> https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/grok-dev
>
More information about the Grok-dev
mailing list