[Grok-dev] Grok and chameleon

[Wichert Akkerman]

People are using five.pt and grokcore.* in production systems, so it is 
not too early at all. Apparently sometimes innovation happens earlier in 
Zope 2 ;)

Wichert.


On 2010-2-8 10:46, Souheil CHELFOUH wrote:
> That's probably a bit early to start and argue about back compatibility.
> Let's try and do the best option for Grok and see how we can get some
> backward compatibility.
> We do not want to get stuck, obvisouly, nor to burn bridges around us :)
>
> So, let's get started with the chameleon integration already !
>
> 2010/2/8 Sylvain Viollon<sylvain at infrae.com>:
>> On Sat, 06 Feb 2010 14:59:35 +0100
>> Martijn Faassen<faassen at startifact.com>  wrote:
>>
>>> Hey,
>>>
>>
>>   Hello,
>>
>>> I think we should be careful with this stuff. That is, we should
>>> definitely allow a profile of grokcore.view that uses the
>>> zope.pagetemplate implementation. That should be fine with Zope 2.
>>>
>>> In general the whole concept that "we can't do this because Zope 2 is
>>> using Grok stuff" worries me a little as we might end up in the "too
>>> many different stakeholders to move anywhere" situation all too
>>> easily. So while I appreciate the input, and I'm going to listen to
>>> it, I'd be against letting it weigh so heavily that Grok cannot
>>> evolve forward anymore.
>>>
>>
>>   I don't have any problem with that change. I think it might conflict
>>   with people using five.pt, maybe, but I don't. I use
>>   megrok.chameleon, where I want Chameleon templates (explicitly).
>>
>>
>>   Sylvain,
>>
>> --
>> Sylvain Viollon -- Infrae
>> t +31 10 243 7051 -- http://infrae.com
>> Hoevestraat 10 3033GC Rotterdam -- The Netherlands
>> _______________________________________________
>> Grok-dev mailing list
>> Grok-dev at zope.org
>> https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/grok-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Grok-dev mailing list
> Grok-dev at zope.org
> https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/grok-dev


-- 
Wichert Akkerman <wichert at wiggy.net>   It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/                  It is hard to make things simple.