[Gsoc] proposal suggestions

[Lennart Regebro]

On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Uli Fouquet <uli at gnufix.de> wrote:
>  Well, in a way. In fact the current docgrok and the Grok object
>  introspector are tied up (or "integrated"), where the latter uses
>  functionality from the first, where appropriate. So you can examine a
>  ZODB object (introspector) supplemented by information grabbed in the
>  respective package by docgrok etc. So 'introspector' in my proposal
>  means both: the ZODB browser and the package browser. I should have make
>  that clearer in my proposal.

No, that was clear. I'm trying to say that Martins proposal is neither
of these. It's a component registry tool.

>  > Martin is concentrating on the component registry introspector, so
>  > Jesper might look at building the base for better object inspectors,
>  > and Uli on the documentation tool?
>
>  By "documentation tool" you mean the Grok introspecor/docgrok?

Yes.

>  And by  "object inspectors" basically a ZODB browser/information gatherer?

Right.

You could say that the difference is by inspecting classes, and
showing the API and docstrings (doc tool), and inspecting objects and
it's attributes and annotations (introspector).

-- 
Lennart Regebro: Zope and Plone consulting.
http://www.colliberty.com/
+33 661 58 14 64