[ZODB-Dev] Multi-version concurrency control

[Steve Alexander]

>>Why not extend the proposal to remove versions from ZODB 4 altogether?
> 
> 
> There are a lot of reasons not to remove versions.  We don't have any
> plans to work on ZODB4 at the moment, so it wouldn't get done for a long
> time anyway.

When I read the proposal, I assumed that the MVCC work would be on ZODB 
4, not ZODB 3.

I guess that was a combination of my mind hanging on to previous 
discussions about the roadmap for MVCC, and that the proposal doesn't 
say what version of the ZODB it applies to.

I have a small team working on an application that uses ZODB 4. We 
expect it to be used by some real people in 2 - 3 months. Should we 
consider changing to ZODB 3?

--
Steve Alexander