[ZODB-Dev] new-style class status

Jim Fulton jim at zope.com
Wed Oct 22 05:00:35 EDT 2003


Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 12:09:49PM -0400, Tim Peters wrote:
> 
>>[Jim Fulton]
>>
>>>Why would anybody want this?  The new code is to support people who
>>>want to use ZODB 3 and ExtensionClass together.  I though that set
>>>was the same as people who want to use Zope.
>>
>>I don't know that anybody does want it, now that you mention it.  I'm pretty
>>sure John Belmonte doesn't.  But since ExtensionClass has been part of ZODB
>>3 releases to date, I don't know that nobody wants it either.  Anyone?
> 
> 
> Well, IndexedCatalog's IndexedObject is a Persistent class, and it
> derives from ExtensionClass, so it would be nice to keep some sort of
> compatibility.

Does it use any ExtensionClass features?

 > Then again, if it's a trivial port, it may not be worth
> it.

Assuming that you aren't using any ExtensionClass features,
It's a question of changing a "P" to a "p".

Jim

-- 
Jim Fulton           mailto:jim at zope.com       Python Powered!
CTO                  (540) 361-1714            http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation     http://www.zope.com       http://www.zope.org




More information about the ZODB-Dev mailing list