[ZODB-Dev] new-style class status
Jim Fulton
jim at zope.com
Wed Oct 22 05:00:35 EDT 2003
Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 12:09:49PM -0400, Tim Peters wrote:
>
>>[Jim Fulton]
>>
>>>Why would anybody want this? The new code is to support people who
>>>want to use ZODB 3 and ExtensionClass together. I though that set
>>>was the same as people who want to use Zope.
>>
>>I don't know that anybody does want it, now that you mention it. I'm pretty
>>sure John Belmonte doesn't. But since ExtensionClass has been part of ZODB
>>3 releases to date, I don't know that nobody wants it either. Anyone?
>
>
> Well, IndexedCatalog's IndexedObject is a Persistent class, and it
> derives from ExtensionClass, so it would be nice to keep some sort of
> compatibility.
Does it use any ExtensionClass features?
> Then again, if it's a trivial port, it may not be worth
> it.
Assuming that you aren't using any ExtensionClass features,
It's a question of changing a "P" to a "p".
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:jim at zope.com Python Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714 http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org
More information about the ZODB-Dev
mailing list