[ZODB-Dev] Same transaction object (re)-used for subsequent requests?

Dieter Maurer dieter at handshake.de
Fri May 4 13:58:47 EDT 2007


Andreas Jung wrote at 2007-5-1 11:23 +0200:
> ...
>I think you are right (as always). Then let me rephrase the question: how 
>can one distinguish if two transaction objects represent the same or
>different transactions in such case where memory address is identical?

Why are you interested in such a distinction?

  While you must deliver the same connection in the same transaction,
  there is no harm to deliver a given connection to different transactions
  (provided their lifespans do not overlap).



-- 
Dieter


More information about the ZODB-Dev mailing list