[ZODB-Dev] Same transaction object (re)-used for subsequent
requests?
Dieter Maurer
dieter at handshake.de
Fri May 4 13:58:47 EDT 2007
Andreas Jung wrote at 2007-5-1 11:23 +0200:
> ...
>I think you are right (as always). Then let me rephrase the question: how
>can one distinguish if two transaction objects represent the same or
>different transactions in such case where memory address is identical?
Why are you interested in such a distinction?
While you must deliver the same connection in the same transaction,
there is no harm to deliver a given connection to different transactions
(provided their lifespans do not overlap).
--
Dieter
More information about the ZODB-Dev
mailing list