[ZODB-Dev] Same transaction object (re)-used for subsequent requests?

[Andreas Jung]

--On 4. Mai 2007 19:58:47 +0200 Dieter Maurer <dieter at handshake.de> wrote:

> Andreas Jung wrote at 2007-5-1 11:23 +0200:
>> ...
>> I think you are right (as always). Then let me rephrase the question:
>> how  can one distinguish if two transaction objects represent the same or
>> different transactions in such case where memory address is identical?
>
> Why are you interested in such a distinction?
>
>   While you must deliver the same connection in the same transaction,
>   there is no harm to deliver a given connection to different transactions
>   (provided their lifespans do not overlap).

You can't use one connection for concurrent transactions in different 
threads. Starting a transaction over the same connection would result in 
nested transactions instead of concurrent transactions.

-aj

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zodb-dev/attachments/20070504/02ebca95/attachment.bin