[Zope-PTK] How is the review process meant to work? (was: providing a read-only
interface)
interface)
Paul Browning
paul.browning@bristol.ac.uk
Wed, 15 Mar 2000 06:15:20 +0000
Mike wrote in answer to Philipp:
> It might take us a couple go-rounds before we're both talking about
> the same thing. I say this because it sounds to me as though you simply
> want unauthenticated users to be able to view portal content, which they
> can do 'out of the box'. That is to say, that's how the PTK is configured
> by default. The content merely has to be published first.
>
> A Reviewer must first approve content for it to be publicly visible.
> The owner of content may ask for a Reviewer to do this by using the
> 'Publish item' link. (This is the same interface that the Reviewer uses
> to approve an item.) This request-approve cycle is called publishing.
>
I like the Member -> Contributor -> Reviewer -> Manager model
but I'm having trouble getting it to work.
I haven't fathomed how the Reviewer is alerted that there is
something new to approve. Could someone clarify? Is an e-mail
meant to be sent to reviewers, is there an in-tray of stuff
to be reviewed somewhere, do the lights flash in your room?
Also: in my experiments I can't get any user with the Reviewer
role to approve things - I can only get users with the Manager
role to approve stuff.
Also, also: I can't make users with the role Contributor to approve
their own stuff. I can make users with the role Reviewer approve
their own stuff OK (but not that of other users - see first Also:).
I'm basing these observations on a complete and fresh CVS download
from the middle of Tuesday afternoon UK time. Apologies if I'm being
dim.
Paul
--
The Library, Tyndall Avenue, Univ. of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TJ, UK
E-mail: paul.browning@bris.ac.uk URL: http://www.bris.ac.uk/