[Zope-CMF] Re: [dev] i18n improvements - a proposal

[yuppie]

Florent Guillaume wrote:
> Dieter Maurer wrote:
> 
>> yuppie wrote at 2005-8-9 19:11 +0200:
>>
>>> ...
>>> 2.) Using different domains for different products:
>>>
>>> While 'cmf_default' should be used by the core products (CMFCore, 
>>> CMFDefault, CMFTopic, CMFSetup) I'd like to use 'cmf_calendar' for 
>>> CMFCalendar.
>>
>>
>>
>> Can we give "CMFCore" its own domain?
>>
>> We would like to use "CMFCore" without any reference to
>> "CMFDefault".
>>
> 
> Frankly I hate domains. The less domains there are, the better. Myself, 
> I'd much rather have a single "cmf" domain for everything in CMF. Let 
> addon frameworks like Plone or CPS add their own for their own use, but 
> I think it's folly to have several domains for pure CMF packages.

Does that mean you are voting against using 'cmf_calendar' in CMFCalendar?

The reason why I'd like to use a different domain for CMFCalendar is 
that CMFCalendar is our example add-on product. This way we *use* 
different domains for Actions and TypeInfos within the CMF, showing how 
to do that and making sure it works.


Cheers, Yuppie