[Zope-CMF] Re: [dev] i18n improvements - a proposal

[Jens Vagelpohl]

> Does that mean you are voting against using 'cmf_calendar' in  
> CMFCalendar?
>
> The reason why I'd like to use a different domain for CMFCalendar  
> is that CMFCalendar is our example add-on product. This way we  
> *use* different domains for Actions and TypeInfos within the CMF,  
> showing how to do that and making sure it works.

Is it our example add-on product? It's not been all that well- 
maintained to be deserving of that status... ~8-0

My 2¢ are that I'm all for making sure different domains work well,  
and CMFCalendar *seems* the only suitable add-on in the software  
package. It's probably a good idea to just use that, and then maybe a  
single domain for everything else in the base package as Florent  
suggests.

jens