[Zope-CMF] Re: [dev] i18n improvements - a proposal

[Florent Guillaume]

yuppie wrote:
>>> Can we give "CMFCore" its own domain?
>>>
>>> We would like to use "CMFCore" without any reference to
>>> "CMFDefault".
>>>
>>
>> Frankly I hate domains. The less domains there are, the better. 
>> Myself, I'd much rather have a single "cmf" domain for everything in 
>> CMF. Let addon frameworks like Plone or CPS add their own for their 
>> own use, but I think it's folly to have several domains for pure CMF 
>> packages.
> 
> 
> Does that mean you are voting against using 'cmf_calendar' in CMFCalendar?

I'm -0 on cmf_calendar.

But definetly -1 on separating the rest into cmf_core, cmf_default, etc.

Florent


-- 
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France)   CTO, Director of R&D
+33 1 40 33 71 59   http://nuxeo.com   fg at nuxeo.com