[Zope-CMF] Re: CMF roadmap update
Jens Vagelpohl
jens at dataflake.org
Tue Apr 25 10:46:46 EDT 2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 25 Apr 2006, at 15:08, Chris Withers wrote:
> Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
>>> I sent an email about this a couple days ago. Basically, I'm down
>>> to one failing unit test in CMFUid and have discovered that
>>> CMFUid is basically broken in 2.0/trunk. I also sent an email on
>>> this issue to the list, hoping that the developers who wrote
>>> CMFUid and lobbied hard to get it included would take notice and
>>> do something about it (or at least acknowledge it), but all I see
>>> is silence so far.
>> At least I have found what the problem with CMFUid is, and it is
>> mostly a misunderstanding how it is supposed to work. Mea culpa.
>> I'm still left with the one failing unit test on the events
>> branch, though.
>
> Having such an unknown and unmaintained piece of code in the core
> of the cmf scares me.
>
> How would people feel about deprecating it for 2.1 and removing it
> in 2.3 if no-one steps up who wants it?
Well, I have my own opinion about that, but the course of action
depends mostly on those people who are using it. No one seems to,
judged by the complete silence.
As I have found, it is only used in one specific situations: If you
create a Favorite pointing to a piece of content, then that piece
gets tagged with a UID, and the UID identifies the content piece for
the Favorite. So you can copy/paste/whatever the content and the
Favorite still knows how to find it.
jens
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFETjZXRAx5nvEhZLIRAjXvAJwKHXTisxiklmJJSx90XX67IBfD0QCghZzg
8IQx6SgTQpE68yce7gVsEPw=
=Jqjt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Zope-CMF
mailing list