[Zope-dev] Zope-2.3.3 & Python 2.1.3 ? possible or mission impossible

[Andreas Jung]

Don't use 2.1.3 because Zope 2.3 is not supported to run under Python 2.X.
Use Python 1.5.2 instead.

-aj

P.S. and take care with the use of digitial IDs. E.g. Outlook Express
refused to reply to this message without valid digital IDs (so this reply
goes only to the list and not as CC: to you)

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dirk Datzert" <Dirk.Datzert@rasselstein-hoesch.de>
To: <zope-dev@zope.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 03:57
Subject: [Zope-dev] Zope-2.3.3 & Python 2.1.3 ? possible or mission
impossible


Hi all,

I currently need to build Zope-2.3.3. yeah this is not the latest stable
one.
I have to build it with Python 2.1.3.

Is this possible ?

I got and traceback on 'python wo_pcgi.py'

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/src/packages/BUILD/Zope-2.3.3-src/w_pcgi.py", line 111, in ?
    if __name__=='__main__': main(sys.argv[0])
  File "/usr/src/packages/BUILD/Zope-2.3.3-src/w_pcgi.py", line 109, in main
    import wo_pcgi; wo_pcgi.main(me)
  File "/usr/src/packages/BUILD/Zope-2.3.3-src/wo_pcgi.py", line 104, in
main
    import build_extensions
  File "/usr/src/packages/BUILD/Zope-2.3.3-src/inst/build_extensions.py",
line 105
, in ?
    make('lib','python','BTrees')
  File "/usr/src/packages/BUILD/Zope-2.3.3-src/inst/do.py", line 134, in
make
    do('make -f Makefile.pre.in boot PYTHON=%s' % sys.executable)
  File "/usr/src/packages/BUILD/Zope-2.3.3-src/inst/do.py", line 104, in do
    if i and picky: raise SystemError, i
SystemError: 512

I read sometimes something about broken BTrees. Is this my problem ?

Thanks,
Dirk

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
   -    Andreas Jung                            Zope Corporation       -
  -   EMail: andreas@zope.com                http://www.zope.com      -
 -  "Python Powered"                       http://www.python.org     -
  -   "Makers of Zope"                       http://www.zope.org      -
   -            "Life is too short to (re)write parsers"               -
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------