[Zope-dev] Re: [RfC] Removal of old stuff in Zope 2.10

[Andreas Jung]

--On 20. Dezember 2005 14:05:26 +0100 Florent Guillaume <fg at nuxeo.com> 
wrote:

>> - Gadfly(DA) - do we really need this? We discussed this already. In my
>>   opinion the purpose of Gadfly is only educational but nothing that one
>>   really needs or uses for production. It could be removed and made
>>   available for download on zope.org.
>
> Gadfly should go, but OTOH have sqlite in its place would still provide
> SQL inside Zope and that could be a good plus.
>

This would require to move two more third-party packages into the Zope core
(without having checked the licenses for the DA and the Python bindings).
We discussed that issue already. Third party packages are a burden when the 
developers aren't active contributors to the Zope core.

-aj


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-dev/attachments/20051220/36d69188/attachment.bin