[Zope-dev] Re: OFS.Application deprecations for Zope 2.10
Chris McDonough
chrism at plope.com
Mon Jun 12 09:09:35 EDT 2006
Right, sorry. I've been out of the loop. I haven't been keeping up
with the latest goings on.
FWIW, I recently needed to emulate this machinery for "Basket" so I
can sympathize with wanting to make it saner, but I question the
wisdom of deprecating 'methods'.
IMHO, we should ignore the fact that the lookup for "methods" attrs
comes after the comment that says "Support old-style product
metadata". registerClass does not provide an automated way to do
what "methods" does. The "new regime" way to do what it does would
be to use a Five view, but this wouldn't work for non-URL lookups.
So people who use 'methods' now will need to monkeypatch in hideous
ways just like the 'methods' stuff does now, in which case why not
leave it?
- C
On Jun 12, 2006, at 6:57 AM, yuppie wrote:
> Hi Chris!
>
>
> Chris McDonough wrote:
>> Jusst out of curiosity, what is the rationale for deprecating
>> "methods"?
>
> It has been deprecated for at least 6 years now, I just added the
> warnings last year.
>
> I don't know the old discussions, but the comments added here make
> pretty clear that initialize() was meant to replace
> '__ac_permissions__', 'meta_types' and 'methods':
> http://svn.zope.org/Zope/trunk/lib/python/OFS/Application.py?
> r1=18170&r2=18185
>
> I guess 'methods' was never meant to be used for something else
> than factory methods.
>
> As Florent already pointed out using it for general monkey patching
> doesn't look like a good idea. We only can improve the product
> initialization if we first remove some cruft.
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Yuppie
>
More information about the Zope-Dev
mailing list