[Zope-dev] package dependency refactoring progress report

[Marius Gedminas]

On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 08:59:34PM +0200, Martijn Faassen wrote:
> What about simply calling it zope.view? (I don't like the plural in 
> package names either generally)

FWIW at some point I decided that singular is appropriate when a package
defines a concept, and plural is appropriate when a package provides
multiple implementations of that concept.

Thus you have zope.interface but zope.$anything.interfaces.

Marius Gedminas
-- 
http://pov.lt/ -- Zope 3 consulting and development
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-dev/attachments/20090524/bc3834d5/attachment.bin