[Zope-PAS] mutable property sheets
Jens Vagelpohl
jens at dataflake.org
Sun Apr 16 12:35:58 EDT 2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 16 Apr 2006, at 18:27, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
>> I hate to say it, but GRUF isn't an example for anything right or
>> good when it comes to user folders. And that opinion goes right up to
>> the top in Plone circles.
>
> No argument there. But considering how popular GRUF is its
> behaviour is
> a good measure of what people are used to.
IMHO this makes that specific behavior a candidate for being in the
Plone layer as opposed to the PAS layer. Or at least set up in PAS so
it is not the default behavior.
>> So my own opinion is that I don't like the persistence magic for
>> setting properties. IMHO the methods on the properties plugins should
>> be called explicitly instead of automatically whenever anyone touches
>> one of these mutable property sheets.
>
> That makes your code very verbose though. For all changes you have to
> figure out which plugin the property belongs to, figure out which user
> folder should be used, get the plugin from that userfolder and call a
> method on that.
There's two specific reasons I have for not liking it. First of all,
it's magic. Magic is just plain bad in my book. Simple and explicit
is better. Secondly, I fear implementations inadvertently writing
more than necessary into a potentially expensive data store (think
RDBMs, LDAP, etc).
jens
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFEQnJvRAx5nvEhZLIRAlaJAJ4rBJNdO3GNwVXrGbdvc/jLZI8iHwCdFrdz
9UHkGKDXNfTxgtBWXr575wY=
=xt3t
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Zope-PAS
mailing list