[Zope] Opinions sought on acquisition issue

[Sven Fischer]

> I think it's a good thing for organizing the image elements of webpages,
> such that the site can start off with stock templates, and subsections can
> be progressively modified without re-coding the DTML (e.g. by graphic
> non-programmer types), by (e.g.) putting same-named .gif's in
> subdirectories.... sort of like, inheritance for .gif's.
> But... probably would be better to have a special foldertype to make that
> clear.

i agree, some type of generic folder wich would maybe stick to the top or
bottom of the object list which would inherit from its parent too and would
contain all generic stuff which is for the moment clurttering the root
folder.

lets say i have this

folder1 / images
folder1 / folder2 / images

i'd like to call the images always as "images/xxx.gif" whether i'm in
folder1 or folder2

that would greatly clean the code imho,

$ven