[Zope] Documentation via this list was.. Pay or DIO (Re: Quality
vs. Quantity )
Paul Browning
paul.browning@bristol.ac.uk
Mon, 11 Mar 2002 08:29:28 -0000
--On 11 March 2002 00:22 -0600 Tim Cook <twcook@iswt.com> wrote:
> Here's a suggestion that I see works well on another list
> (linuxmanagers) that is the same or very similar to what you
> suggested.
>
> The questions are posted to the list.
> ALL responses are sent only to the original person asking the
> question. That person is tasked with sending a reply where the
> subject line is prefaced with the word "SUMMARY". This summary
> contains a concise list of the responses received and which one(s)
> were attempted and the results of those attempts.
I think this is an excellent proposal.
>
> This procedure:
> 1. cuts down on list traffic
> 2. puts responsibility on the person asking the question to
> contribute back better detailed results
> 3. creates a very useful archive
>
> Disadvantages:
> 1. May inhibit productive discussion?
2. Risk loosing pearls of wisdom if summary of off-line response
not forthcoming
3. Requires discipline early on - perhaps people indicating that
they will follow the protocol should put something like
WILL SUMMARISE
in the Subject line
The list archives should end up showing a one-to-one correspondence
of SUMMARY and WILL SUMMARISE messages and we'll all live happily
ever after ;-) Dangling WILL SUMMARISE messages will haunt the
original poster for the rest of time .....
Paul
--
The Library, Tyndall Avenue, Univ. of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TJ, UK
E-mail: paul.browning@bristol.ac.uk URL: http://www.bris.ac.uk/