[Zope] Zope Requests - POST vs. GET
Tino Wildenhain
tino at wildenhain.de
Mon Dec 15 14:19:00 EST 2003
Hi Tom,
Passin, Tom wrote:
> [Andreas Jung]
>
>>--On Montag, 15. Dezember 2003 16:05 Uhr +0100 Tino Wildenhain
>><tino at wildenhain.de> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Maybe next example makes it more transparent:
>>>
>>>you make a link published in a e-mail which provides
>>
>>information of
>>
>>>an article in a shop referenced by QUERY-String, of course.
>>>
>>>In the resulting page there is the option to log in
>>>first - of course with POST.
>>>
>>
>>ok, thanks for pointing this out :-)
>
>
> But in this example, the uri + query string came from the email and
> would have beend sent using a GET, while the login would have been done
> using a POST with no need for the query string parameters. The login
> page should contain the destination uri, and should not depend on
> getting them from a query parameter copied from a previous page.
The login page is the same for every article. So it cannot contain
the destination URL. Of course one had to copy the QUERY parameters
into a hidden form field. Which is also next to ugly.
> So this example does not argue strongly for a combination of GET and
> POST. IMHO, the two should not be mixed because they have different
> semantics. A POST is intended for sending information to the server to
> apply to the resource designated by the current uri, a GET is for
> requesting a new page designated by the uri. I think it is wise to keep
> them separated.
I dont think so. Its just a hindering decision to implement it this way.
Better approach would have been to implement a GET and a POST namespace
in REQUEST as well as mirroring the variables into Form as they are
now.
After all, a QUERY string in a Post URL is just valid information. I
really cant see why Zope does not let us access it. And I'm very into
standards.
Regards
Tino
More information about the Zope
mailing list