[Zope] still having problems
Dennis Allison
allison at shasta.stanford.edu
Mon Nov 14 21:21:25 EST 2005
ZEO 3.4.2
Zope 2.8.4
ZODB 3.4.2 as relesed with Zope 2.8.4B
Python 2.4.2 or 2.3.5
MySQL 4.0.20
MySQL-Python 1.2.0
MYSQLDA 2.0.9
We have just moved from Zope 2.7.6 to Zope 2.8.4 motivated, in part, but
the ability to avoid read conflicts under ZODB 3.4.2. We have been having
a lot of problems: more conflict errors, release of unreleased locks in
MySQL transactions, loss of session variables, and others.
We use session variables and MySQL very heavily. All database tables are
now transactional (innodb) migrated from the MyISAM tables in use
earlier.
The connection string, by the way, does not use either the '-' or '+'
prefix but relies on a run-time test for the table to be determined to
be transactional.
All our Zope instances run with ZEO and use a Temporary Store instance for
session variables. The ZEO configuration is:
<filestorage 1>
path $INSTANCE/var/Data.fs
</filestorage>
# temporary storage has to be ZEO side
%import tempstorage
<temporarystorage temp>
name temporary storage for sessioning
</temporarystorage>
and is matched to the Zope configuration:
<zodb_db main>
mount-point /
# ZODB cache, in number of objects
cache-size 5000
<zeoclient>
server 192.168.0.92:8301
storage 1
var $INSTANCE/var
# ZEO client cache, in bytes
cache-size 20MB
# Uncomment to have a persistent disk cache
client group1-zeo
</zeoclient>
</zodb_db>
#
# ZEO temporary storage
#
<zodb_db temporary>
<zeoclient>
server 192.168.0.92:8301
storage temp
name zeostorage
var $INSTANCE/var
</zeoclient>
mount-point /temp_folder
container-class Products.TemporaryFolder.TemporaryContainer
</zodb_db>
Are these configurations correct?
The snippet of log shown below show the problem that plagues us:
------
2005-11-14T06:20:40 ERROR txn.4100 Error in tpc_abort() on manager
<MultiObjectResourceAdapter for <Products.ZMySQLDA.db.DB instance at
0x42c6a52c> at 1186514860>
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
"/usr/local/src/zope/Zope2.8/lib/python/transaction/_transaction.py", line
462, in _cleanup
rm.tpc_abort(self)
File
"/usr/local/src/zope/Zope2.8/lib/python/transaction/_transaction.py", line
548, in tpc_abort
self.manager.tpc_abort(txn)
File "/usr/local/src/zope/Zope2.8/lib/python/Shared/DC/ZRDB/TM.py", line
64, in abort
try: self._abort()
File "/opt/zope/zproducts/standard/ZMySQLDA/db.py", line 389, in _abort
self._tlock.release()
error: release unlocked lock
------
2005-11-14T06:20:40 INFO ZODB conflict error at
/classes/class_applications/classaccess/topic_html (658 conflicts since
startup at 2005-11-11T01:26:40)
------
2005-11-14T06:20:40 ERROR txn.4100 Failed to abort object: Surrogate
oid=<object object at 0x4009d470>
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
"/usr/local/src/zope/Zope2.8/lib/python/transaction/_transaction.py", line
562, in abort
self.manager.abort(o, txn)
File "/usr/local/src/zope/Zope2.8/lib/python/Shared/DC/ZRDB/TM.py", line
64, in abort
try: self._abort()
File "/opt/zope/zproducts/standard/ZMySQLDA/db.py", line 389, in _abort
self._tlock.release()
error: release unlocked lock
------
2005-11-14T06:20:40 ERROR txn.4100 Failed to abort resource manager:
<MultiObjectResourceAdapter for <Products.ZMySQLDA.db.DB instance at
0x42c6a52c> at 1186514860>
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
"/usr/local/src/zope/Zope2.8/lib/python/transaction/_transaction.py", line
489, in abort
rm.abort(self)
File
"/usr/local/src/zope/Zope2.8/lib/python/transaction/_transaction.py", line
562, in abort
self.manager.abort(o, txn)
File "/usr/local/src/zope/Zope2.8/lib/python/Shared/DC/ZRDB/TM.py", line
64, in abort
try: self._abort()
File "/opt/zope/zproducts/standard/ZMySQLDA/db.py", line 389, in _abort
self._tlock.release()
error: release unlocked lock
which is a pattern typical of the many such entries: a log entry for an
abort which raises a lock error, a report of a conflict error, a report of
a failure to abort a Surrogate oid, followed by a second abort of the
first instance.
We also see frequent KeyError failures in the session variable data
structure which suggests that the copy-out/modify/copy-in mechanism used
to tickle the persistence mechanism does not run to completion and so the
Zope persistence fail and the session variable structure is pruned or
removed at some random later time. Some diagnostics are seen which
report that the REQUEST['SESSION'] is occasionally removed.
Questions:
~~~~~~~~~~
What is the cause of the locking problem? Does ZMySQLDA/MySQL-Python/Zope
have some path which should have called begin to get a lock and did not?
What needs to be done to make session variables stable? Does the
Temporary Storage method need to be extended to allow for rolling back
a transaction? (What's a good approch if this is necessary? Is there
any existing product supporting this?)
Any other help or advice would be appreciated.
More information about the Zope
mailing list