[Zope] Re: Zope 2.8 or 3.1?
Tres Seaver
tseaver at palladion.com
Thu Oct 27 11:49:53 EDT 2005
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Sascha Ottolski wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 27. Oktober 2005 13:20 schrieb Jens Vagelpohl:
>
>>You just noted one more disadvantage yourself: The system Python is
>>likely to be out of step with what Zope wants. Furthermore, updates
>>to the system Python or to add-on packages might have unintended
>>consequences for your Zope setup.
>
>
> well, "might have" is one thing, really experiencing problems is quite
> different...
It *has* happened to Real Zope Users (TM) in the past, and it *will*
happen again.
One "unintended consequence" of using /usr/bin/python on RHEL / Fedora
boxen, for instance, is that they compile Python with UCS-4 unicode
(four bytes for every unicode character!). This setting doesn't matter
for short-lived scripts or GUI utils, and may even be superior. For a
long-running, memory-intensive Python process, it is grossly nefficient.
WRT maintenance of the system: while at ZC, I actually maintained a
separate 'zc-python' RPM which installed itself in '/opt/zc'; all the
Zope RPMs I maintained depended on 'zc-python' rather than 'python'.
Users whose pagers / cell phones go off if Zope crashes (this is my
definitino of "enterprise user", BTW) should install a separate Python.
Non-enterprise users can likely get away without it.
Tres.
- --
===================================================================
Tres Seaver +1 202-558-7113 tseaver at palladion.com
Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFDYPch+gerLs4ltQ4RAjBwAKDJVAl/igH7hnSeYNRzceXyC8qvHgCgkKIK
5zjZgfdq6bCnOPMuGxPqozc=
=E9Fl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Zope
mailing list