[Zope] Zope vs Plone: performance issues!

[Hugo Ramos]

Well... They were already using Zope's cache and Squid to proxy some static HTML
I guess the problem is Plone itself... Skins etc...




On 1/24/06, Sasha Vincic <sasha.vincic at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 1/24/06, Peter Bengtsson <peter at fry-it.com> wrote:
> > On 1/24/06, Hugo Ramos <ramosh at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I'm responsible for a big corporate intranet and corporate portal.
> > > They were using Zope/Plone before I got here and the problems are too many.
> > >
> > > Let's talk about performance issues... Plone is VERY SLOW responding
> > >
>
> <snip>
>
> > Yes!
> > But not good enough.
> > Most performance issues with Plone can be solved by caching. Don't
> > underestimate it.
>
> Yes Plone is slow but with caching you get very good performance. I
> have boosted performance on plone sites from default 1-3req/s to
> 100req/s and then it was the bandwith that was the bottleneck. The
> sites where serving both anonymous and authenticated content. I
> recommend to check out the CacheFu product and documentation in the
> collective.
>
> /Sasha
> Lovely Systems - www.lovelysystems.com
>


--
Hugo Ramos - ramosh at gmail.com
http://otugga.blogspot.com/