[Zope] Improved Zope Org Proposal

[David H]

Andrew Sawyers wrote:

>On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 21:41 +0200, Dieter Maurer wrote:
>  
>
>>Then I fear few interesting content will arrive at this site.
>>
>>    
>>
>Well, I think the content of this site is what I'd noted is what I noted
>in earlier emails.  It might not be 'interesting', but I would hope it
>to be quality and focused.  I have faith the 'interesting' aspects you
>wish will come from the community.
>
>  
>
>>We use Plone.org's infrastructure. When I remember right,
>>we have membership there and this membership contributes
>>a good deal of valuable content (software, howtos, faqs).
>>    
>>
>We have failed at managing the breadth of content and properly
>presenting it to potential and exisitng Zope users.  Maybe that
>sub-community has not.
>  
>
>>Why should it be different for Zope.org?
>>    
>>
>Because it has not shown it can rise to the occasion.  Outside our
>community this might not be so obvious, but referring new co-workers to
>zope.org when they inquire as to the technology I bring to the table at
>work, is an embarrassment.
>
>I think my position is pretty clear.  It's up to the Foundation
>ultimately.  I was asked to get the proposal out.  I've provided my
>view.  The rest will become history.  :)
>
>Andrew
>
>  
>
>>
>>    
>>
Everyone has a point.

Zope is WAY too cool not to have a great web presence.  But we need a 
TEAM LEADER on this.

I can pitch in and I know others will as well ...

David

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope/attachments/20060625/f6e90b6f/attachment.htm