[Zope3-dev] Re: ZCML bad ;-)

[Gary Poster]

On Jan 24, 2006, at 12:22 PM, Shane Hathaway wrote:

> Fred Drake wrote:
>> On 1/24/06, Chris Withers <chris at simplistix.co.uk> wrote:
>>> Shane Hathaway wrote:
>>>
>>>> Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> However, I think one namespace for ZCML is enough.
>> Are you sure?
>> Perhaps it's reasonable to use a single namespace for all the ZCML
>> directives defined as part of the Zope 3 release.
>
> Agreed.  Let's just do that.
...
> Separate namespaces for separate business entities makes sense to  
> me. What doesn't make sense to me is having separate namespaces for  
> every subsystem, which is too deep a hierarchy.

I would be OK with that.  That seems like it's a reasonable compromise.

Gary