[ZPT] Mini proposal: repeat-define and repeat-condition

[Tom Deprez]

Petter Enholm wrote:
<snip>
 
> I have worked with software development for a long time, and if there
> is one thing I have learned it is never to break backward
> compatibility. Implement new funcionality either as new
> functions/methods or with flexible parameters to a function. Never
> change a given interface which will break old programs. 
> 
> Maybe the given TAL implementation is not the best, but it works and
> lots of people have written templates with it. PLEASE leave it as it
> is and consider Shane's suggestion with repeat-define and repeat-
> condition instead. 

+1

Regards,
Tom.