23 May
2009
23 May
'09
8:23 a.m.
2009/5/23 Adam GROSZER <agroszer@gmail.com>:
The problem that I see here with lxml is that it is used for output checking. Even worse z3c.form requires at least 2.1.1 of lxml, where KGS 3.4 has lxml nailed at 1.3.6.
It might be possible to shed this testing dependency; ``lxml`` is used because of its doctest-mode, but since then, Chameleon has been equipped to render attributes in the ZPT order (instead of more or less random). This was the raison d'etre to use lxml in tests.
This burpes already on buildout. Now even if I would ignore this requirement for testing, (and testing) how could I be sure that tests pass (with KGS 3.4)?
Yes, I agree with that observation. \malthe