[Grok-dev] Re: maintaining the Grok website
Martijn Faassen
faassen at startifact.com
Tue Sep 18 14:56:55 EDT 2007
Hey,
Martin Aspeli wrote:
[snip]
>> * we explore the use of a CMS. I know Sebastian is building one with
>> Grok. Darryl has one too. Then we probably have enough people on board
>> with knowledge of two Zope 2 CMSes: Plone and Silva, so those are
>> options too. The latter options are attractive as they're more
>> feature-rich than the Grok-based ones.
>
> Please don't take this the wrong way, but I think you're mad to want to
> invent a new CMS in Grok. If a great one existed already, of course
> that'd be good. Having a project that community was vested in will also
> help you maintain it and keep it up to date (like plone.org does to
> Plone, PloneHelpCenter and PloneSoftwareCenter). But this really stinks
> of NIH.
I think you took me the wrong way entirely. You seem to be forgetting
that I was lead developer on the Silva *CMS* for years? It's pretty
amusing you are arguing with me that using a CMS has its advantages. :)
I don't think anyone is mad for wanting to create a new CMS with Grok.
It's not like the final CMS has been written and nobody can write a new
one anymore, after all. I think you actually agree, you just express
yourself badly. :)
There are already two projects to create a CMS for Grok. We can
definitely explore using them, right?
[snip Plone advocacy, Plone has features and a community that can help
us, and so on]
Yes, indeed. As I wrote:
>> Then we probably have enough people on board
>> with knowledge of two Zope 2 CMSes: Plone and Silva, so those are
>> options too. The latter options are attractive as they're more
>> feature-rich than the Grok-based ones.
I don't think your rather heavy-handed Plone advocacy was really
appropriate here.
Regards,
Martijn
More information about the Grok-dev
mailing list