[Zope-CMF] Re: Adapterizing CMFCore.WorkflowTool

[Laurence Rowe]

yuppie wrote:
<snip/>
>> and adapterizing workflow status and history: 
>> http://plone.org/products/roadmap/221
> 
> +1
> 
> I just would prefer named adapters over multi-adapters. And deprecate 
> getHistoryOf, setStatusOf and getStatusOf.

The problem with using named adapters is that it becomes necessary to 
make individual registrations for every workflow id. You could have all 
calling code fallback to general interface lookup, but this would make 
it pretty much impossible to deprecate getHistoryOf, setStatusOf and 
getStatusOf. Perhaps I've missed a better way of handling this?

Laurence