[Zope3-dev] Re: [Zope-CMF] Fighting the Zope 2.9 testrunner

[Tres Seaver]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jim Fulton wrote:
> Tres Seaver wrote:
> ...
> 
>> I'm not sure what Chris meant, but the change to the visual output of
>> the testrunner when running "with dots" seems gratuitous to me, as well
>> - -- I don't see any benefit to the "indented, narrower" output,
>> especially because it's "prettiness" gets fouled up anyway by
>> deprecation warnings, etc.  I objected to the change enough to file
>> collector issues:
>>
>>   http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/1958
>>
>>   http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope3-dev/493
> 
> 
> Your objections are and were noted.  I don't really
> care about the format. I thought I had improved the output
> at the time.  I find the new format easier to read myself
> but I really don't care. If people would prefer a different
> format, someone please change it.
> 
> What's really depressing about this is that we are spending
> so much energy and angst over the layout of dots.

Especially as you usually run tests without them. ;)

>>
>>> What the heck are you talking about? What doesn't work?
>>
>>
>>
>> Zope 2.9 broke the 'confiugre-make' dance in several ways, due (I think)
> 
> 
> What does that have to do with the test runner?

I thought that there was some disussion of a broader theme: "2.9 breaks
stuff that Zope 2 developers expecdt", of which the testrunner changes
one example.


Tres.
- --
===================================================================
Tres Seaver          +1 202-558-7113          tseaver at palladion.com
Palladion Software   "Excellence by Design"    http://palladion.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEIW8P+gerLs4ltQ4RAn0JAKC/ukcRbPSR929dg4UqKtvwLg6o8QCfSBaO
keexxXjQJ4gQ+G/VSOqrWnk=
=rGJb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----