[Zope-DB] ZODB Vs Mysql

[Bo M. Maryniuck]

=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Friday 13 June 2003 19:55, Norman Lorrain wrote:
> If you really want to use Zope (an excellent system, don't misunderstand
> me) stay away from RDBMS's.

Why?.. I use Zope + Oracle with dozen of different tables and views, a lot =
of=20
stored procedures and so on without any problems and I think Zope is OK.=20
Using ZODB for 100 tables is OK, if you will try Toby's Dickenson's Disk=20
Storage, instead of ZODB stored into the RAM. But using ZODB -- it is anoth=
er=20
song, since ZODB is object database, not relation one. So if you feel good=
=20
yourself with RDBMS, do it. Yes, RDBMS is a bit slower vs. ZODB, but will=20
work stable[1] and good[2].

_______________
1. Depends from DB you will chose
2. Depends from how you will do indexing and code inside Zope.

=2D --=20
Regards, Bogdan M.Maryniuck

Think different? I'd be happy if most people would just think...
=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-rc1-SuSE (GNU/Linux)

iQEXAwUBPu10XFY3t553W5hKFAJ3lAQAxelGkyAb9hX8Olfa+IYGye/aHMajhx4R
NNbyo0HAoVAEeLaheYxUftJuUkNGDiy5aNx8fnWXow/GFekW48Y/sOmlXhgKwh6L
efR10CfQTIIB6ZN14D2XUPMgTVlcF7yXB/m6h0zulbatVsMLlJ3bWHIbhbzqOHGx
BAoNt5AWMp4EAKwZgW1NZsdDXEQoSj8Sy02ehSka2MumIjdqHQ4NJfkIT2oLkBQ8
MJ4Nh6tfX7mIrS/PsUWfQbr+iE7U4Iob1vlIkyhSn5F7bCQSnfv9uO0sCEV0jOoU
cY+TIq2z+lTmYJuR2DjKuwcib1FqZ8nMHJrWvO1fQojAYU9Uku782/WG
=3D2awO
=2D----END PGP SIGNATURE-----