- Zope - Zope lists

Re: [Zope] Changing my session identity
by Karl Anderson 20 Jul '00

20 Jul '00

jpenny(a)universal-fasteners.com writes: > On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 11:38:23AM -0400, Chris McDonough wrote: > > No, unfortunately, you need to stop and restart the browser. > > Well, netscape 4.73 at least identifies http://server:8080 and > http://server.whatever.com:8080 as separate authentication > domains. So, you can use one as your administration account and > one as your test account, if you are in the same domainas the server. On my linux box, I add another alias to the same IP in /etc/hosts for a separate user. I also switch between localhost and my hostname for a server on my own box. This also works for cookies. Obvious once it was pointed out to me! -- Karl Anderson karl(a)digicool.com

1 0

Linux.com interview with Ethan Fremen
by Martijn Pieters 20 Jul '00

20 Jul '00

http://www.linux.com/interviews/20000720/64/ -- Martijn Pieters | Software Engineer mailto:mj@digicool.com | Digital Creations http://www.digicool.com/ | Creators of Zope http://www.zope.org/ | ZopeStudio: http://www.zope.org/Products/ZopeStudio -----------------------------------------------------

1 0

RE: [Zope] NESTED IN STATEMENTS AND PASSING VARIABLES in DTML
by Theodore Patrick 20 Jul '00

20 Jul '00

THANKS A TON!!! I just found that the following solutions works also: I think the only difference is the id is evaluated in the namespace variable before invoking the SQL_METHOD <dtml-in "active_category_method()"> <dtml-in "category_method(id=(_['id']))" size=100 start=query_start> id=<dtml-var id>&seq=<dtml-var seq>&vid=<dtml-var vid> </dtml-in> </dtml-in> or <dtml-in "1,2,323,23,23"> <dtml-in "category_method(id=(_['sequence_item']))" size=100 start=query_start> id=<dtml-var id>&seq=<dtml-var seq>&vid=<dtml-var vid> </dtml-in> </dtml-in> ------------------------------------ Your point on the SQL_METHODS is a good one! I had no idea! Theodore E. Patrick -----Original Message----- From: jpenny(a)universal-fasteners.com [mailto:jpenny@universal-fasteners.com] Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2000 1:28 PM To: Theodore Patrick Cc: zope(a)zope.org Subject: Re: [Zope] NESTED IN STATEMENTS AND PASSING VARIABLES in DTML On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 12:27:01PM -0500, Theodore Patrick wrote: > What is the DTML syntax for nested in statements. Here is an example. > > ________________________________________ > EXAMPLE 1: NO VARIABLE PASSING > > GOAL: loop 4 times and with each loop run the category_method and print out > the results: > > <dtml-in "1,2,3,4"> > <dtml-in "category_method(id='1')" size=100 start=query_start> > id=<dtml-var id>&seq=<dtml-var seq>&vid=<dtml-var vid> > </dtml-in> > </dtml-in> > > WORKS! > > ________________________________________ > EXAMPLE 2: VARIABLE PASSING > > GOAL: Loop in the active_category_method and for each row run the > category_method passing a new 'id' variable and print out the results. > > <dtml-in "active_category_method()"> > <dtml-in "category_method()" size=100 start=query_start> > id=<dtml-var id>&seq=<dtml-var seq>&vid=<dtml-var vid> > </dtml-in> > </dtml-in> > > ERROR --> ID is not being passed to "category_method()" > ________________________________________ > > Anyone have a solution out there? > > NOTE: active_category_method and category_method are SQL METHODS. Where 'id' > is and SQL_VAR for category_method. This is FAQ material and should be inserted into either the DTML programmer's guide or the ZSQL Methods guide. It bites everyone who uses SQL methods eventually. ZSQL methods do not perform acquisition, but will look at REQUEST, change it to. <dtml-in "active_category_method()"> <dtml-call "REQUEST.set('id', id)"> <dtml-in "category_method()" size=100 start=query_start> id=<dtml-var id>&seq=<dtml-var seq>&vid=<dtml-var vid> </dtml-in> </dtml-in> If you have a lot of arguments that need to be captured, you can build a DTML Method, say setup_category_method_parameters that has these builds the REQUEST. Then your dtml can look like: <dtml-in "active_category_method()"> <dtml-call setup_category_method_parameters> <dtml-in "category_method()" size=100 start=query_start> id=<dtml-var id>&seq=<dtml-var seq>&vid=<dtml-var vid> </dtml-in> </dtml-in> > > Thanks in advance! > > Theodore E. Patrick > Ishophere.com > > _______________________________________________ > Zope maillist - Zope(a)zope.org > http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope > ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** > (Related lists - > http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce > http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ) >

1 0

Re: [Zope] Problems with Coding differences to do same stuff... boundary="------------EAFFAD5A57052936695E91D7"
by Dieter Maurer 20 Jul '00

20 Jul '00

> Trying to do a simple thing as creating a document and then adding a > property with an DTML method, found that the following code does not > work, it comes up with a password request (all security settings are at > defaults): > > <dtml-call > "company.noticias.manage_addDTMLDocument(titulo,subtitulo,texto)"> > <dtml-with "company.noticias._[titulo]"> > <dtml-call > "propertysheets.manage_addProperty('link',resumen,'text')" > > </dtml-with> Try <dtml-with "_.getattr(company.noticias,_[titulo])"> In DTML, you are not allowed to access any attribute starting with "_". And in fact, "_" is not even an attribute of "company.noticias". Dieter

2 2

RE: Reversing acquisition?
by Spicklemire, Jerry 20 Jul '00

20 Jul '00

"B" is acquirable by "C" and "D", because it is within the context of a common container, "A". However, some other object, "E" that is acquired from higher up the containment chain may be affected by the nature of the "B" that is available to "D". Because of that, the "E" may appear differently than it would if presented as a component from some other containment chain. An easy example to grasp is to think of "B" as defining the background color of a page. If "E" is the master page template, other "B" objects in other chains could define the color scheme for the all the objects ("pages") in the parent folder. That's context. -----Original Message----- From: Luciano Ramalho [mailto:luciano@hiper.com.br] Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2000 1:23 PM To: Spicklemire, Jerry Subject: Re: Reversing acquisition? Great ASCII illustration! I see what you mean. But I still donŽt see the difference between "containment" and "context" as defined in the AquisitionUsage Wiki (quoted below). []s Luciano "Spicklemire, Jerry" wrote: > > Ramalho wrote: > > >""" > >- Containment: Search the object, then its container, then the > >container's container, and so on. Ignore objects not in this chain. > > > >- Context: Search the objects in precisely the reverse of the order in > >which they were mentioned, so "A.B.C.D" is always searched in the order > >"D", "C", "B", "A". > > > >""" > > > >But for me, A.B.C.D means that A contains B; B contains C; and C > >contains D, so I donŽt see the difference from the first definition. > > There's a good slide in Michel's presentation at the open source conference. > > Imagine: > > -------------------- > | ----- --------- | > | | B | | C | | > | ----- | ----- | | > | | | D | | | > | A | ----- | | > | | | | > | --------- | > -------------------- > > So that "A" is a folder, > "B" is an object in "A", > "C" is a subfolder in "A", > and "D" is an object in "C". > > Then "B" is acquirable by "D", or any object in "C", but "B" is not > contained in either "C" or "D". > > Later, > Jerry S. >

1 0

Incorrect Article: Zope Costly enterprise option
by Eric L. Walstad 20 Jul '00

20 Jul '00

Hi Tom and the editors at InfoWorld, In regards to your article titled "Zope is a powerful open-source server" FYI, ZEO is now open source and free. It's been that way since March 2000. Is it possible to fix your article before too many folks get the wrong idea? Here's a link to all the details: http://www.zope.org/Products/ZEO/ZEOFactSheet Thanks, Eric Walstad.

1 0

Infoworld Review of Zope
by Brad Clements 20 Jul '00

20 Jul '00

Sorry if this has been posted already, I'm in digest mode on this list. http://www.infoworld.com/articles/mt/xml/00/07/17/000717mtzope.xml Is ZEO really $25K? Brad Clements, bkc(a)murkworks.com (315)268-1000 http://www.murkworks.com (315)268-9812 Fax netmeeting: ils://ils.murkworks.com AOL-IM: BKClements

2 1

Reversing acquisition?
by Spicklemire, Jerry 20 Jul '00

20 Jul '00

Ramalho wrote: >""" >- Containment: Search the object, then its container, then the >container's container, and so on. Ignore objects not in this chain. > >- Context: Search the objects in precisely the reverse of the order in >which they were mentioned, so "A.B.C.D" is always searched in the order >"D", "C", "B", "A". > >""" > >But for me, A.B.C.D means that A contains B; B contains C; and C >contains D, so I donŽt see the difference from the first definition. There's a good slide in Michel's presentation at the open source conference. Imagine: -------------------- | ----- --------- | | | B | | C | | | ----- | ----- | | | | | D | | | | A | ----- | | | | | | | --------- | -------------------- So that "A" is a folder, "B" is an object in "A", "C" is a subfolder in "A", and "D" is an object in "C". Then "B" is acquirable by "D", or any object in "C", but "B" is not contained in either "C" or "D". Later, Jerry S.

1 0

RE: [Zope] Infoworld Review of Zope
by Chris McDonough 20 Jul '00

20 Jul '00

No. He got it wrong. ZEO is open-sourced, free, and available for download and has been since ~ a month ago. Write to the InfoWorld guy and tell him. :-) > -----Original Message----- > From: Brad Clements [mailto:bkc@murkworks.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2000 1:46 PM > To: zope(a)zope.org > Subject: [Zope] Infoworld Review of Zope > > > Sorry if this has been posted already, I'm in digest mode on > this list. > > http://www.infoworld.com/articles/mt/xml/00/07/17/000717mtzope.xml > > Is ZEO really $25K? > > > > Brad Clements, bkc(a)murkworks.com (315)268-1000 > http://www.murkworks.com (315)268-9812 Fax > netmeeting: ils://ils.murkworks.com AOL-IM: BKClements > > _______________________________________________ > Zope maillist - Zope(a)zope.org > http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope > ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** > (Related lists - > http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce > http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ) >

2 1

Scarry BTreeFolder eats my 'contents' tab
by Dirksen Lau 20 Jul '00

20 Jul '00

Just as soon as I restarted Zope after placing the BTreeFolder in the Products dir, wham! all my files were disappeared!! It took me quite a while to collect the pieces of my minds and pulled them together again when I discovered through FTP that my files were still inside Zope. Back in the HTTP manage console I also found that the 'Contents' tab was gone, and it was the same with most of the folders in my Zope site. After removing the BTreeFolder from the Products dir, the 'contents' tab was back again. Everything seemed normal except the /Control_Panel/Products/ still had an entry of BTreeFolder. Really weild!! I'm running Zope 2.2.0b3 on NT4. Any idea to tame this beast is appreciated. RGDS Dirksen

2 1